Media
Station Damsyik Syria dibom 6 Ogos 2012 . . .
1WC’sChannel REVIEW 2012: (2 hours ago) Raw Footage,
Media Broadcasting station in Damascus is bombed a few hours ago. This is the
second time media has been bombed. Recently they kidnapped and killed a TV
anchor. This is how Syria's enemies wage a Media war, by killing the alternate
voice. (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: (2 Jam lalu) Futej mentah, stesen Media Penyiaran di
Damsyik dibom beberapa jam yang lalu. Ini adalah media masa yang ke-2 telah
dibom. Baru-baru ini mereka telah diculik dan dibunuh sauh TV. Ini adalah
bagaimana musuh-musuh Syria melancarkan perang Media, dengan membunuh suara-suara
silih ganti)?
Al-Qaeda
thrives as US helps to 'flip' Syria (1 hour
ago):
REMINDER Always Aware Yourself 2012: Do not wait for 21. December 2012. Prepare!!! Extreme
Wether, Earth Changes, Mystery Universe, Wild sun, Coming disaster, march,
April, may, june, july . . . . . . . August (Ramadan) . . . to .
. . September (Shawwal)?!!!
Israel
Mahu Kerajaan Syria untuk dijatuhkan . . .
Seseorang mungkin memikirkan satu kenyataan
yang jelas sebagai tajuk perlu tidak mempertahankan. Dalam DUNIA yang DUSTA
begitu banyak dan maklumat PALSU ia Saya takut.
Terdapat tanggapan karut di kalangan
pelbagai kumpulan kiri dan mereka yang menentang kerajaan Syria, bahawa rejim
Israel tidak mahu melihat kejatuhan Assad. Video ini debunks tanggapan ini.
Semua sumber yang digunakan yang
diketengahkan di dalam artikel dengan mobil murah Phelan saya mengenai subjek
SyrianGirlpartisan: Saya
ingin menyebut Israel tidak takut daripada negara-negara islam, kawan yang
terbaik di rantau ini ialah Arab Saudi. Persaudaraan Islam sama ada bukan
sesuatu yang buruk bagi Israel, melihat ayam belanda MB berjalan dan sekutu
dengan Israel. Dan Amerika Syarikat (US) dan Israel tidak Takut "Al
Qaeda", kerana mereka mengawal semua di bawah panji-panji itu sejak
penubuhannya.
REMINDER Aware Yourself 2012: Do not wait
for 21. December 2012. Prepare!!! Extreme Wether, Earth Changes, Mystery
Universe, Wild sun, Coming disaster, march, April, may, june, july . . . . . .
. August (Ramadan) . . . to . . . September (Shawwal)?!!!
One might think such an obvious statement
as the title need not defending. In a world of so much lies and disinformation
i'm afraid it does. There has been a ridiculous notion amongst numerous left
groups and those opposed to the Syrian government, that the Israeli regime does
not want to see Assad fall. This video debunks this notion
All sources used are featured in my article
with Lizzie Phelan on the subject
I
want to mention Israel is not affraid of islamic countries, its best friend in
the region is Saudi Arabia. The muslim brotherhood is not a bad
thing for Israel either, look at turkey it is MB run and is allies with Israel.
And the US and Israel are not Afraid
of "Al Qaeda", because they control all under that banner since its
inception. .
Annan's spokesman says
international community has 'failed' in Syria:
1WC’sChannel REVIEW 2012: (Published: 03 August, 2012/Edited: 04 August, 2012) The United Nations General Assembly votes on a resolution on Syria at UN headquarters on August 3, 2012 in New York City. (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu undi Perhimpunan Agung pada resolusi ke atas Syria di ibu pejabat pada 3 Ogos, 2012 PBB di New York City (AFP Photo/Mario Tama).
PBB menerima pakai resolusi yang sukar ke atas Syria . . .
Perhimpunan Agung PBB telah mengundi menyokong resolusi tidak terikat ke atas Syria ditolak oleh beberapa negeri Arab. Sebelum undi, Rusia mengumumkan bahawa ia tidak akan menyokong resolusi yang memanggil ia tidak seimbang.
Rang undang-undang telah diluluskan dengan 133 undi memihak, 12 melawan, dan 31 berkecuali.
Resolusi, yang dikarang oleh Arab Saudi dan aktif yang disokong oleh Mesir dan Bahrain, menuntut bahawa Presiden Bashar al-Assad pemindahan kuasa kepada kerajaan peralihan dan Tentera Syria berhenti kereta kebal dan helikopter serangan terhadap pasukan pemberontak.
Ia juga menuntut bahawa menahan diri Syria daripada menggunakan senjata kimia dan biologi. Fasal ini datang selepas pengumuman terkini dari Damsyik yang mengatakan bahawa Syria memiliki senjata kimia, dan tidak akan teragak-agak untuk menggunakan mereka menentang tentera menyerang. Perhimpunan Agung mengutuk tindakan keras Syria terhadap pasukan pemberontak manakala mengkritik ketidakgiatan Majlis Keselamatan.
Semasa sesi di New York, Setiausaha Agung, Ban Ki-Moon berkata konflik Syria telah menjadi "perang proksi," dan menggesa kedua-dua pembangkang dan pasukan pemberontak untuk menamatkan keganasan. "Tindakan keganasan yang dilaporkan mungkin merupakan jenayah terhadap kemanusiaan atau jenayah perang," katanya.
Duta Syria, Bashar Jaafari menyatakan bahawa negara-negara yang menyokong resolusi tersebut, khususnya Arab Saudi dan Qatar, tidak tepat edenic oasis hak asasi manusia. Keputusan ke atas resolusi datang selepas peletakan jawatan daripada utusan PBB Kofi Annan dan kegagalan rancangan 6-mata keamanan.
Ketetapan itu tidak akan sah di sisi undang-undang, semua resolusi Perhimpunan Agung adalah nasihat. Laluan rang undang-undang itu tidak pun mungkin mempunyai impak yang serius terhadap iklim politik yang menyelubungi Syria, membuka jalan untuk kemungkinan sekatan. Undi asalnya telah dijadualkan pada pagi Khamis, tetapi telah ditangguhkan sehingga hari Jumaat.
Moscow mengundi menentang resolusi tersebut. "Ia (resolusi) amat berat sebelah dan ditulis seolah-olah tidak ada tentangan bersenjata di semua," Rusia PBB duta Vitaly Churkin berkata. Beliau juga menegaskan bahawa beberapa klausa, seperti yang mengkritik Majlis Keselamatan, adalah sesuatu Rusia tidak dapat bersetuju dengan.
Churkin juga menyatakan bahawa meletakkan satu resolusi ke atas Syria untuk mengundi dalam Perhimpunan Agung "adalah tidak sesuai" dan "melanggar Piagam PBB," kerana isu itu telah dibincangkan dalam Majlis Keselamatan. Rusia dan China telah menggunakan kuasa veto tiga resolusi Majlis Keselamatan yang berasingan ke atas Syria. Dalam setiap kes, kedua-dua negara mendakwa bil tidak seimbang.
'Perjuangan untuk Aleppo dan Damsyik'
Atas alasan di Syria, pertempuran untuk rages Aleppo pada. Pemberontak berkata, pertempuran utama berlaku dalam kejiranan Saleheddine, di mana mereka dianggarkan 20 orang awam telah terbunuh. Lain mendakwa mereka berjaya menawan balai polis utama, mengambil beberapa pegawai tebusan, dan merampas senjata dan peluru.
Di ibu Negara Damsyik, tentera kerajaan juga bertempur dengan pemberontak di kejiranan Tadamon. Aktivis dan saksi memberitahu Reuters bahawa kebanyakan bandar adalah di bawah kawalan kerajaan dengan awal petang. Tentera Darat telah cuba untuk memasuki Tadamon selama lebih dari seminggu, tetapi secara berterusan telah diadakan semula oleh tentangan pemberontak.
'Barat bukan maut sokongan'
Sebagai pasukan pembangkang dan kerajaan akan terus bertembung, setiap pihak menerima ikrar kesetiaan daripada negara-negara yang menyokong sebab-sebab masing-masing. Timbalan Perdana Menteri Syria Qadri Jamil memberitahu AP bahawa negara ini telah meminta bagi pinjaman Rusia untuk menambah rizab mata wang keras, yang telah habis oleh sekatan eksport antarabangsa Syria.
Beliau berkata Damsyik juga mahu mendapatkan minyak diesel dan keluaran minyak yang lain dari Rusia sebagai pertukaran untuk bekalan minyak mentah. Pegawai Rusia telah disahkan ceramah di Moscow, tetapi tidak menyatakan sama ada Moscow telah bersetuju untuk mengadakan Syria dengan minyak atau pinjaman.
Bercanggah laporan media telah dikeluarkan, yang menyarankan kemungkinan pengangkutan Rusia yang singgah di pelabuhan Syria Tartus (Syrian port of Tartus,) tetapi Kementerian Pertahanan Rusia berkata kapal 3 di kawasan tersebut tidak mempunyai rancangan untuk berbuat demikian, melainkan jika misi kapal ini diperluaskan.
Sementara itu, Britain telah bersumpah kesetiaan kepada pembangkang, dengan berjanji untuk meningkatkan "tidak membawa maut" sokongan kepada pemberontak Syria. Sekatan EU senjata menghalang mana-mana negara menyediakan senjata kepada mana-mana pihak dalam konflik Syria, tetapi itu tidak menghentikan UK dari menunjukkan sokongan dengan cara yang lain.
Dalam satu kenyataan, Setiausaha Luar UK William Hague berkata, "Kami akan, sepanjang minggu-minggu yang akan datang, meningkatkan sokongan praktikal kami tetapi bukan membawa maut. Kami telah membantu (pembangkang) dengan komunikasi dan perkara-perkara seumpama itu, dan kami akan membantu mereka. "Menurut laporan, Washington juga baru-baru ini mengesahkan komitmen kepada pembangkang Syria.
Satu sumber kerajaan Amerika Syarikat memberitahu Reuters bahawa Presiden Barack Obama telah menandatangani perintah rahsia (signed a secret order) yang membenarkan CIA dan lain-lain agensi-agensi Amerika untuk menyokong pemberontak Syria. Obama dilaporkan memberi perintah itu awal tahun ini.
The UN General Assembly has voted in favor of a non-binding resolution on Syria pushed by several Arab states. Before the vote, Russia announced that it would not support the resolution, calling it unbalanced.
The bill was passed with 133 votes in favor, 12 against, and 31 abstentions.
The resolution, authored by Saudi Arabia and actively supported by Egypt and Bahrain, demands that President Bashar al-Assad transfer power to a transitional government and that the Syrian Army ceases tank and helicopter attacks against rebel forces.
It also demands that Syria refrain from using chemical and biological weapons. This clause comes after a recent announcement from Damascus alleging that Syria possessed chemical weapons, and would not hesitate to use them against an invading army. The General Assembly denounced the Syrian crackdown on rebel forces while criticizing the Security Council’s inaction.
During the session in New York, Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon said the Syrian conflict had become a “proxy war,” and called on both opposition and rebel forces to end the violence. "The acts of brutality that are being reported may constitute crimes against humanity or war crimes," he said.
Syrian envoy Bashar Jaafari noted that countries supporting the resolution, specifically Saudi Arabia and Qatar, were not exactly edenic oases of human rights. The decision on the resolution came after the resignation of UN envoy Kofi Annan and the failure of his six-point peace plan.
The resolution will not be legally binding, as all General Assembly resolutions are advisory. Passage of the bill may nonetheless have a serious impact on the political climate surrounding Syria, paving the way for the possibility of sanctions. The vote had originally been scheduled for Thursday morning, but was postponed until Friday.
Moscow voted against the resolution. “It (the resolution) is extremely one-sided and was written as if there was no armed opposition at all,” Russia’s UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin said. He also stressed that a number of clauses, such as the one that criticizes the Security Council, were something Russia could not agree to.
Churkin also noted that putting a resolution on Syria to vote in the General Assembly “was inappropriate” and “contravened the UN Charter,” as the issue was already being discussed in the Security Council. Russia and China have vetoed three separate Security Council resolutions on Syria. In each case, both countries claimed the bills were unbalanced.
‘The struggle for Aleppo and Damascus’
On the ground in Syria, the battle for Aleppo rages on. Rebels said the main fighting was taking place in the neighborhood of Saleheddine, where they estimated 20 civilians had been killed. Others claimed they managed to capture a major police station, taking several officers hostage, and seizing weapons and ammunitions.
In the capital Damascus, government troops also clashed with rebels in the neighborhood of Tadamon. Activists and witnesses told Reuters that most of the city was under the control of the government by early evening. The Army has been trying to enter Tadamon for more than a week, but has been continuously held back by rebel resistance.
‘Western non-lethal support’
As opposition and government forces continue to clash, each side is receiving pledges of loyalty from nations supporting their respective causes. Syria’s Deputy Prime Minister Qadri Jamil told AP that the country has asked for a Russian loan to replenish its hard currency reserves, which have been depleted by an international embargo on Syrian exports.
He said Damascus also wants to get diesel oil and other oil products from Russia in exchange for crude supplies. Russian officials have confirmed talks in Moscow, but have not indicated whether Moscow has agreed to provide Syria with oil or a loan.
Conflicting media reports were released, suggesting the possibility of Russian transports calling at the Syrian port of Tartus, but Russia’s Ministry of Defense says its three ships in the area have no plan to do so, unless the ships’ mission is extended.
Meanwhile, Britain has vowed its loyalty to the opposition, by promising to increase its “non-lethal” support to the Syrian rebels. An EU arms embargo prevents any nation from providing arms to any party in the Syrian conflict, but that isn’t stopping the UK from showing support in other ways.
In a statement, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said,“We will, over the coming weeks, increase our practical but non-lethal support. We have helped [the opposition] with communications and matters of that kind, and we will help them more." According to reports, Washington has also recently reaffirmed its commitment to the Syrian opposition.
A US government source told Reuters that President Barack Obama has signed a secret order allowing the CIA and other American agencies to support the Syrian rebels. Obama reportedly gave the order earlier this year.
Barat mencuba untuk menukar Assad ke Gaddafi baru’ . . .
1WC’sChannel REVIEW 2012: (2 hours ago) The UN General Assembly has condemned the Security Council for failing to stop the violence in Syria with a majority vote. Russia has voted against the resolution, calling it imbalanced. Moscow is also urging the UN and the Arab League to move fast in finding a new chief peacemaker for Syria, as Kofi Annan's stepping down. RT talks to Patrick Hayes, reporter for the online current affairs magazine Spiked. (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: (2 jam lalu) Perhimpunan Agung PBB telah mengutuk Majlis Keselamatan kerana gagal untuk menghentikan keganasan di Syria dengan undi majoriti. Rusia telah mengundi menentang resolusi tersebut, memanggil ia seimbang. Moscow ini juga menggesa Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu dan Liga Arab untuk bergerak pantas dalam mencari pendamai ketua baru bagi Syria, Kofi Annan yang meletak jawatan. RT bercakap kepada Patrick Hayes, wartawan hal ehwal dalam talian majalah semasa yang menerjah).
Selepas Pemusnahan Iraq & Libya NATO Amerika Bersedia Untuk Bunuh berJuta Satu lagi Untuk menghambakan Syria . . .
TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: Trojan Horses
pencerobohan NATO - PBB Majlis Hak Asasi Manusia, Amnesty International, Human
Rights Watch, dll adalah antara juara yang paling bersemangat campur tangan
Syria dan seterusnya ke Harmagedon.
Syria pertama "cerita bayi inkubator"
timbul Ogos lalu. "Tentera kerajaan Syria" telah memotong bekalan
elektrik. Ia dengan cepat terdedah sebagai luar dipersoalkan. Antara satu sama
lain datang pada 8 Februari, 2012 dengan nombor yang berbeza dari 18 hama buruk
80 berikutnya. Dengan kedua-dua cerita, sebagai versi Iraq, tiada kebingungan
ibu bapa atau keluarga yang besar telah ditemui, tiada perhimpunan pengebumian.
Kemudian cerita, juga, secara senyap-senyap hilang.
Pengarah Eksekutif baru Amnesty
International, Amerika Syarikat, Suzanne Nossel, bekas Penolong Timbalan
Hillary Clinton Hal Ehwal Pertubuhan Antarabangsa, di Jabatan Negeri. Beliau
juga telah sebelum ini bekerja untuk Human Rights Watch.
Dia: ". . . telah melancarkan beberapa
kempen menentang Iran, Libya dan Syria."
Dakwaan bahawa Kuwait memberikan Amnesty US
$ 500,000 untuk menyokong Iraq "inkubator bayi" cerita tidak pernah
pergi jauh. Tetapi pulau kecil, terkenal pernah dipanggil: "Sebuah
syarikat minyak yang menyamar sebagai sebuah negara," dengan penduduk
hanya 2595628 (Julai 2011) termasuk 1291354 bukan-warganegara, juga mempunyai
pengaruh proksi berkuasa Amerika.
Pada tahun 1999, 1 perjanjian telah
ditandatangani di antara Amerika Syarikat dan Kuwait untuk sebuah pasukan Amerika
Syarikat yang tetap yang akan ditempatkan di sana dalam 12 kemudahan.
Perjanjian untuk asas, secara kebetulan,
telah dinamakan: "Operasi Desert Spring."
Di sini adalah kebetulan. Pada bulan Mac
2010, Libya telah mengundi, berhampiran dengan sebulat suara, kepada
Jawatankuasa PBB Hak Manusia, selepas Laporan berbara mengenai hak kemajuan
manusia. Selepas kempen ganas oleh Jam Tangan PBB yang berpangkalan di Geneva
bukan sahaja mereka diusir, tetapi 19 bulan kemudian, negara mereka musnah
binasa, 50000 Libya matidi bawah bom NATO, pemimpin Libya lynched dan
kebanyakan kerajaan Jamahiriya dibunuh atau masih diseksa.
Tidak mengejutkan, pengampunan, Cik Nossel
telah bercakap pada beberapa peristiwa dengan Pengarah PBB Watch, Hillel Neuer,
Montreal kelahiran peguam yang kerjaya telah berkhidmat sebagai kerani
undang-undang kehakiman untuk Keadilan Itzhak Zamir, di Mahkamah Agung Israel.
Pada Mac tahun lepas, terdapat seolah-olah
sedikit harapan bahawa NATO dan "sekutu" akan kembali dari mengulangi
bencana tragis yang berlaku di Libya dan yang telah melanda Afghanistan dan
Iraq.
Dilakukan di CBS Setiausaha Negara Clinton
(27 mac 2011) bahawa Amerika Syarikat tidak akan campur tangan dalam cara yang
telah berlaku di Libya.
Pada yang sama "Kawan Syria"
Persidangan di Tunis (24hb Februari 2012) UK Menteri Luar William Hague
mengisytiharkan bahawa UK diiktiraf pemberontak dan "Kami datang, kami
melihat dia mati" Clinton yang dipanggil Rusia dan China: "keji"
untuk mereka veto di PBB, yang mungkin telah disekat lanjut "campur
tangan."
Amerika Syarikat berkata ia akan
menimbangkan bantuan ketenteraan kepada pemberontak". Bantuan barat"
seorang wakil daripada mereka berkata mereka telah menerima Dengan
"kawan" seperti ini, Syria pastinya tidak perlu musuh.
Amerika Syarikat, sudah tentu,
"despicably" veto 35 Resolusi keamanan PBB yang berkaitan dengan
Timur Tengah (xiii) termasuk mengenai "Cast Operasi Utama," 2008-2009
Israel Krismas- Tahun Baru serangan ke atas Gaza, dan 2006 Blitzkrieg Israel
Lubnan.
"Peta DUNIA yang baru."
Chillingly, tiada kemarahan atau laungan
"keji" telah diberikan kepada kenyataan, Perdana Menteri Israel,
Benjamin Netanyahu di Switzerland, sehari sebelum persidangan Tunisia, bahawa
ada: "akan menjadi tidak ada Lubnan dalam peta DUNIA yang baru."
Lanjut, beliau menyatakan, bahawa serangan
Israel terhadap Lubnan akan disokong oleh Amerika Syarikat dan Negara-negara Teluk
Amerika.
Bukankah yang demikian itu sebuah taman
hidupan liar gajah di dalam bilik. Memandangkan "Perang Salib,"
George W. Bush kepercayaan oleh bulatan kanan melampau Israel dalam kawalan
mereka di Timur Tengah: "dari Sungai Nil ke Efrat" dan ayat-ayat
Ketua Wesley Clark, tahun 2007, bahawa Pentagon merancang: "(mengambil)
keluar 7 buah negara dalam tempoh 5 tahun, bermula dengan Iraq, dan kemudian
Syria, Lubnan, Libya, Somalia, Sudan dan, penamatnya, Iran." Terdapat
soalan yang jelas, mencetuskan oleh keyakinan Perdana Menteri Netanyahu melalui
serangan Lubnan: Adakah ini AIPAC dan peperangan Israel?
After Destruction Of Iraq &
Libya NATO States Preparing To Kill Another Million To Enslave Syria . . .
1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: Trojan Horses of
NATO aggressions - UN Human Rights council, Amnesty International, Human Rights
Watch, etc. are amongst the most enthusiastic champions of Syrian intervention
and onward to Armageddon.
The first Syria "incubator baby
story" surfaced last August. "Syrian government troops" had cut
the electricity. It was quickly exposed as beyond questionable. Another one
came up on 8th February, 2012 with numbers varying from eighteen poor mites, to
a subsequent eighty. With both tales, as the Iraq version, no distraught
parents or extended families were found, no funeral gatherings. Then the
stories, too, quietly vanished.
The new Executive Director of Amnesty
International, USA, is Suzanne Nossel, formerly Hillary Clinton's Deputy
Assistant for International Organization Affairs, at the State Department. She
has also previously worked for Human Rights Watch.
She: ". . . has launched several
campaigns against Iran, Libya and Syria."
The allegation that Kuwait gave Amnesty
$500,000 for backing the Iraq "incubator baby" story has never gone
away. But the little island, famously once called: "An oil company posing
as a state," with a population of just 2,595,628 (July 2011) including
1,291,354 non-nationals, also has powerful American-proxy clout.
In 1999, an agreement was signed between
the USA and Kuwait for a permanent US force to be stationed there in twelve
facilities.
The agreement for the bases, incidentally,
was named: "Operation Desert Spring."
Here is a further coincidence. In March
2010, Libya was voted, near unanimously, on to the UN Human Rights Committee,
after a glowing Report on human rights progress. After a ferocious campaign by
Geneva-based UN Watch not only were they expelled from it, but nineteen months
later, their country lay in ruins, 50 thousand Libyans died under NATO bombs,
Libyan leader lynched and most of Jamahiriya government is killed or still
tortured.
Amnesty's Ms Nossel, unsurprisingly, has
spoken at a number of events with UN Watch Director, Hillel Neuer, a Montreal
born attorney, whose career has included serving as a judicial law clerk for Justice
Itzhak Zamir, at the Supreme Court of Israel.
In March last year, there seemed a glimmer
of hope that the NATO and "allies" would back away from repeating the
tragic disaster that was unfolding in Libya - and that had already struck
Afghanistan and Iraq.
Secretary of State Clinton committed on CBS
(27th March 2011) that the US would not intervene in the way it had in Libya.
Now, it seems, a miracle is needed, as it
emerges that Saudi Arabia and Quatar are among those subsidizing insurgents
with vast sums - as French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe announced that the EU
is about to further tie the government's hands, by freezing the assets of the
Syrian Central Bank, from 27th February. Syria is already under a crippling
raft of sanctions. France was, of course, one of the leading and most
enthusiastic cheerleaders for the destruction of Libya.
At the same "Friends of Syria"
Conference in Tunis (24th February 2012) UK Foreign Minister William Hague
declared that the UK recognized the insurgents and "We came, we saw, he
died" Clinton called Russia and China: "despicable" for their
veto at the UN, which may well have blocked further "intervention."
The US said it will consider military
assistance to the insurgents - a representative of them said they were already
receiving "western aid." With "friends" like these, Syria
certainly needs no enemies.
The US has, of course,
"despicably" vetoed thirty-five UN peace Resolutions relating to the
Middle East (xiii) including on "Operation Cast Lead," the 2008-2009
Israeli Christmas-New Year onslaught on Gaza, and Israel's 2006 blitzkrieg of
Lebanon.
A "new world map."
Chillingly, no outrage or cries of
"despicable" have been given to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu's statement, in Switzerland, the day before the Tunisia conference,
that there: "would be no Lebanon in the new world map."
He stated, further, that an Israeli strike
against Lebanon would be supported by the United States and Gulf States
countries.
There surely is a wildlife park of
elephants in the room. Given George W. Bush's "Crusade," the belief
by extreme right Israeli circles in their control of the Middle East:
"from the Nile to the Euphrates" and General Wesley Clark's
revelations of 2007, that the Pentagon planned: "(taking) out seven
countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya,
Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." There is an obvious question,
sparked by Prime Minister Netanyahu's confidence over a Lebanon attack: Are
these AIPAC and Israel's wars?
War Voyeurs: Israeli tourists watch Syria battles from safe distance (pelancong Israel menonton pertempuran Syria dari jarak yang selamat)
1WC’sChannel REVIEW 20112: (2 hours ago) Armed with binoculars and cameras, tourists in Israel are flocking to the Golan Heights in the hope of seeing the bloody conflict in neighboring Syria, sparking a trend among tour operators. (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 20112:(2 jam lalu) Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, pelancong di Israel lebih tertarik ke Bukit Golan dengan harapan melihat konflik jiran berdarah di Syria, mencetuskan trend di kalangan pengusaha pelancongan).
1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: Israelis look from an Israeli army post near the village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights at the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (TINJAUAN 1WC'sChannel 2012: Israel melihat daripada pos tentera Israel berhampiran kampung Buqaata di Dataran Tinggi Golan di kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Menahem Kahana)
War voyeurs: pelancong Israel menonton pertempuran Syria dari jarak yang selamat
Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, pelancong di Israel lebih tertarik ke Bukit Golan dengan harapan melihat konflik berdarah di Syria jiran, mencetuskan trend di kalangan pengusaha pelancongan. Di hari ini dan usia, menyaksikan ikan paus nampaknya hanyalah tidak potong mana-mana lagi.
Ia jauh lebih menghiburkan untuk menonton bom jiran-jiran anda dan menembak daylights yang tinggal di antara satu sama lain - dari jarak selamat, berkata, Golan Heights. , Nampaknya, ini adalah kegilaan terbaru di kalangan Israel, yang berduyun-duyun ke mata pandang berhampiran sempadan dengan Syria di negara ini untuk memerhatikan pertempuran berterusan, mengikut Times Israel.
Berbekalkan teropong dan kamera, berduyun-duyun pelancong Israel dan lain-lain telah dilihat menuju ke Bukit Golan. Peminat tindakan Live berharap untuk melihat kelibat pertempuran ganas, yang telah semakin meningkat dalam konflik Syria 17 bulan.
War voyeurs: Israeli tourists watch Syria battles
from safe distance
1WC'sChannel REVIEW 2012: Israelis look from an Israeli army post near the village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights at the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo / Menahem Kahana)
Armed with binoculars and cameras, tourists in Israel are flocking to the Golan Heights in the hope of seeing the bloody conflict in neighboring Syria, sparking a trend among tour operators. In this day and age, whale watching apparently just doesn’t cut it any longer.
It’s far more entertaining to watch your neighbors bomb and shoot the living daylights out of each other - from the safe distance of, say, the Golan Heights. This is, apparently, the latest craze among Israelis, who flock to vantage points near the country’s border with Syria to observe the ongoing clashes, according to the Times of Israel.
Armed with binoculars and cameras, throngs of Israeli and other tourists have been seen heading to Golan Heights. Live action enthusiasts were hoping to catch a glimpse of the savage fighting, which have been steadily increasing in the 17-month Syrian conflict.
Families use binoculars as they watch from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights the smoke rising from the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (Para keluarga menggunakan teropong kerana mereka menonton dari kampung bukit Buqaata di Golan Heights asap naik dari kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab) (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey)
Para keluarga menggunakan teropong kerana mereka menonton dari kampung bukit Buqaata di Golan Heights asap naik dari kampung berhampiran Syria Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey) Tetapi jarak, nampaknya, adalah terlalu besar untuk mendapatkan penjelasanskop pembunuhan beramai-ramai, jadi para penonton terpaksa berpuas hati dengan bunyi tembakan dan letupan.
Trend secara tidak sengaja dimulakan oleh Menteri Pertahanan Israel, Ehud Barak, yang melawat Bukit Golan untuk menilai tahap bahaya kepada Israel IDF dari konflik yang berlaku di Syria. Imej siaran menteri di TV seolah-olah telah mencetuskan tindak balas yang tidak dijangka di kalangan kedua-dua Israel dan pelawat yang datang ke negara ini.
Malah, seri konflik adalah begitu besar bahawa pengusaha pelancongan dilaporkan memikirkan meletakkan konflik-memerhati Syria pada senarai jadual perjalanan disediakan. Mereka yang paling prihatin tentang situasi muncul sebagai pasukan keselamatan Israel, yang mengatakan yang mereka lakukan yang terbaik untuk menyimpan perang-pemerhati jauh daripada pemasangan tentera sensitif di sepanjang sempadan Israel-Syria.
Families use binoculars as they watch from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights the smoke rising from the nearby Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (AFP Photo/Jalaa Marey) But the distance, apparently, is far too great to get a full scope of the carnage, so the spectators have to be content with the sounds of gunfire and explosions.
The trend was unwittingly started by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who visited the Golan Heights to assess the level of danger to Israel’s IDF from the conflict in Syria. Images of the minister broadcast on TV seem to have triggered an unexpected reaction among both Israelis and visitors to the country.
In fact, the draw of the conflict is so great that tour operators are reportedly thinking about putting Syrian conflict-watching on the list of available itineraries. Those most concerned about the situation appear to be Israeli security forces, who say they’re doing their best to keep the war-watchers away from sensitive army installations along the Israeli-Syrian border.
Seen from the hill village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights, smoke ascends from the Syrian village of Jebata al-Khashab (Dilihat dari kampung bukit Buqaata, di Dataran Tinggi Golan, asap naik dari kampung Syria Jebata al-Khashab) (AFP Photo/Menahe Kahana)
A road sign shows the different distances to Jerusalem, Baghdad, Damascus and other locations at an army post in Mount Bental near Kibutz Merom Golan in the Golan Heights (Tanda jalan menunjukkan jarak yang berbeza ke Baitulmuqaddis, Baghdad, Damsyik dan lokasi lain di pos tentera di Gunung Bental berhampiran Kibutz Merom Golan di Golan Heights) (AFP Photo/Menahe Kahana)
A Druze man uses binoculars as he looks towards Syria from part of an abandoned military outpost near the Druze village of Buqaata in the Golan Heights (Seorang lelaki Druze menggunakan teropong kerana dia kelihatan ke arah Syria daripada sebahagian daripada kota kara ditinggalkan tentera berhampiran kampung Druze daripada Buqaata dalam Golan Heights) (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)
REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
People are seen through a camouflage net as they look towards Syria from part of an abandoned military outpost near the Druze village of Buqaata (Orang ramai dilihat melalui penyamaran bersih kerana mereka melihat ke arah Syria daripada sebahagian daripada kota kara yang telah ditinggalkan tentera berhampiran perkampungan itu Druze Buqaata) (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)
Bertentangan dengan pemikiran konvensional, yang mencadangkan bahawa serangan ke atas Iran akan dihadkan hanya kepada negara itu dan kemenangan mudah untuk kuasa-kuasa Barat yang serupa dengan Perang Teluk pertama, John Galt Paints gambaran yang sangat berbeza Bagaimana Iran akan Menang Perang terhadap Israel dan Amerika Syarikat pada Satu jam:
Dalam kurang daripada 60 minit, negara kecil Iran dengan mudah boleh mengalahkan 2 kuasa tentera yang terkuat di DUNIA jika mereka dibenarkan untuk melibatkan diri dalam peluang mogok pertama terhadap kedua-dua negara-negara. Ini tidak sedikit idea yg dibuat-buat sebagai perancang tentera Amerika Syarikat dan Israel sedar implikasi serangan Iran yang menangkap kedua-dua negara tidak bersedia. Masalahnya bukan salah satu strategi atau keupayaan oleh negara sama ada. Unit-unit tentera kedua-dua negara dengan mudah boleh mengalahkan Iran dalam perang nuklear atau konvensional. Bagaimanapun, Iran tidak konvensional negara-bangsa mahupun konsep moden yang terpakai kepada konfrontasi yang akan datang.
Jika Iran untuk menyerang, ia akan menjadi muktamad satu pukulan "menggunakannya atau hilang" pendekatan kepada semua kuasa-kuasa strategik, konvensional dan bukan konvensional.
Sumber: John Galt FLA
Antara lain, Galt menunjukkan bahawa Koperasi Iran telah pun terbenam di Amerika Syarikat melalui pelbagai cara, termasuk imigresen undang-undang untuk bekerja dan sekolah. Ini menunjukkan bahawa pada permulaan konfrontasi mana-mana aset tersebut akan segera dikerahkan di seluruh Amerika Syarikat dalam pelbagai jawatan, termasuk serangan langsung kepada 'sasaran lembut' seperti sekolah, pusat membeli-belah dan tempat-tempat awam.
Selain itu, manakala Israel akan mempunyai sokongan padu tentera dari Amerika Syarikat dan akses kepada senjata nuklear mereka sendiri (tidak pernah diakui tetapi terkenal di kalangan tentera), Iran mungkin sangat baik telah menghasilkan peledak nuklear jarak dekat mampu menarik Baitulmuqaddis (dan telah dilaporkan membangunkan peluru berpandu jarak jauh mampu menarik sasaran domestik Amerika Syarikat). Pihak Israel pasti percaya ini benar, seperti yang mereka telah baru-baru ini dinyatakan bahawa mereka mempunyai sehingga musim panas untuk melumpuhkan dan memusnahkan reaktor nuklear Iran, dan Amerika Syarikat yang dilaporkan menempatkan sekurang-kurangnya 100,000 tentera hanya di luar Selat Hormuz sedia dengan musim bunga ini.
Propaganda yang sedang disebarkan bersungguh-sungguh di dalam kedua-dua pihak - dengan Amerika Syarikat dan Israel secara terbuka membincangkan kemungkinan menyerang Iran seawal Mac, manakala pada masa yang sama agensi-agensi berita Iran dengan sokongan daripada pemimpin tertinggi Ayatollah Ali Khamenei menggalakkan secara aktif naratif untuk "membunuh semua orang-orang Yahudi dan menghapuskan Israel."
Tidak, sebarang konflik dengan Iran akan tiada apa-apa jua seperti Perang Teluk pertama, dan seperti yang telah berpendapat di laman web ini dan lain-lain banyak dalam sfera berita alternatif, sangat baik mungkin penglibatan pertama peperangan yang akan menimpa seluruh dunia, termasuk Rusia dan China.
Filem pendek berikut berlaku 1 tahun dari hari ini dan menggambarkan beberapa minit yang pertama Perang DUNIA III mungkin kelihatan sepert inii. Tetapan, bagaimanapun, bukan Iran, tetapi, ibu kota Israel Jerusalem.
The First Few Minutes of WORLD War III
Will Look Like 2012-2013 . . .
Contrary to conventional thinking, which suggests that an attack on Iran would be restricted only to that country and an easy victory for Western powers similar to that of the first Gulf War, John Galt paints a markedly different picture in How Iran could Win a War against Israel and the United States in One Hour:
In less than sixty minutes, the tiny nation of Iran could easily defeat two of the mightiest military powers in the world if they are allowed to engage in a first strike opportunity against both of those nations. This is not some far-fetched idea as U.S. and Israeli military planners are keenly aware of the implications of an Iranian attack which catches both nations off guard. The problem is not one of strategy or ability by either nation. The military units of both nations could easily defeat the Iranians in a nuclear or conventional war. However, Iran is not a conventional nation-state nor is the modern concept applicable to the confrontation which is coming.
If Iran were to attack, it would be the ultimate one shot "use it or lose it" approach to all strategic, conventional, and non-conventional forces.
Source: John Galt FLA
Among other things, Galt points out that Iranian operatives have already been embedded in the United States through various means, including legal immigration for work and school. This suggests that at the onset of any confrontation those assets would be immediately deployed across the United States in various capacities, including direct attacks on 'soft targets' such as schools, malls and public venues.
Moreover, while the Israelis will have overwhelming military support from the United States and access to their own nuclear weapons (never acknowledged but well know in military circles), the Iranians may very well have already manufactured short-range nuclear warheads capable of striking Jerusalem (and are reportedly developing long-range missiles capable of striking domestic U.S. targets). The Israelis certainly believe this to be true, as they have recently indicated that they have until summertime to disable and destroy Iran's nuclear reactors, and the United States is reportedly deploying at least 100,000 troops just outside of the Strait of Hormuz to be ready by this spring.
The propaganda is being disseminated in earnest on both sides -- with the United States and Israel openly discussing the possibility of attacking Iran as early as March, while at the same time Iranian news agencies with support from supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei are actively promoting the narrative to "kill all Jews and annihilate Israel."
No, any conflict with Iran will be nothing like the first Gulf War, and as has been opined on this web site and many others in the alternative news sphere, may very well be the first engagement of a war that will envelop the entire globe, including Russia and China.
The following short film takes place one year from today and depicts the first few minutes of what World War III may look like. The setting, however, is not Iran, but rather, Israel's capital city of Jerusalem.
Wake up and see what Illuminati & Israel are doing to Iran and others (BANGUNLAH dan lihat apa Illuminati & Israel lakukan kepada Iran dan lain-lain)
If you guys had any idea on what is really going on in the 3rd world, with about a million dead Me, Women and CHILDREN in Iraq, and thousands upon thousands of others dead in syria, afghanistan, yemen, pakistan, oman. please help support the stop of mudering civilians by americans. (Jika anda mempunyai sebarang idea apa yang sebenarnya berlaku di dalam DUNIA ke-3, dengan kira-kira satu juta mati Me, Wanita dan Kanak-kanak di Iraq, dan beribu-ribu orang lain yang mati di Syria, Afghanistan, Yaman, pakistan, Oman. sila membantu menyokong berhenti mudering orang awam oleh Amerika).
